|
Grossmont College English 126: Creative Writing Instructor: K. Sherlock Narrative Viewpoint Download a PDF of these guidelines HERE. |
|||||||
POINT OF VIEW
When the story is told from a consistent
perspective, that perspective is called a point of view ("p. o. v."
for short). Narrative point of
view derives its lexicon from the number and person of its pronouns: first person; second person; third
person. Additionally, pronouns
are characterized as singular or plural. |
|||||||
|
|
1ST PERSON |
2ND PERSON |
3RD PERSON |
||||
SINGULAR |
I, me, my, mine,
myself |
you; your; yours;
yourself |
he, she, it; his, her(s),
its; him, her, it; himself, herself, itself |
||||
|
PLURAL |
we, us, our, ours,
ourselves |
you; your; yours;
yourselves |
they; them; their(s); themselves |
||||
|
Rarely in
narration is the point of view from the reader(s) (i.e., 2nd person), and
even more rare is an attempt to write narration from a plural point of
view. As a beginning writer, you
are advised not to attempt
these. |
|||||||
OMNISCIENCE
A consistent point of view limits the range
and amount of knowledge the narrator can invoke to tell the story. This is called omniscience. Depending on the narrator's
relationship to the story and its characters, the degree of the narrator's
intelligence may be classified as either omniscient, objective, subjective,
or episodically limited. |
|||||||
OMNISCIENT
|
The narrator sees and knows all, and can describe as well as analyze the thoughts and emotions of any character. Such a narrator is a god, and has control over the chronology of the story, moving backward or forward in time to present back-story or to inform the reader of future outcomes. |
||||||
|
OBJECTIVE |
The narrator is an observer, a "fly on
the wall," but cannot enter into the minds of the other characters
except in a speculative way.
Such a narrator is trapped by the chronology and immediacy of the
story, like a reporter "on the scene" of an event transpiring. |
||||||
|
SUBJECTIVE |
A narrator of a subjective point of view (also
known as "limited omniscience") knows everything about a single
character only, and sees the story through the eyes of that character. |
||||||
|
EPISODICALLY
LIMITED |
This narrative point of view is a hybridized
version of omniscient and subjective p. o. v. The narrator is omniscient from a subjective
perspective, meaning that the omniscient narrator has the power to jump
from one subjective viewpoint to the next--from one character to the
next--and experience the same story in different narrative episodes. (This method is used more commonly in
novels than in short stories.) |
||||||
|
There are advantages and logistical challenges to each of these kinds of intelligence. And some are, obviously, more appropriate to certain personal pronouns than others. First person narrators, for example, are by default considered subjective, and third person narrators quite often gravitate toward an omniscient or episodically limited viewpoint so as to draw closer to the feelings and internal landscapes of the characters. The most important aspect of using
controlled narrative points of view is consistency. Even when the point of view switches episodically, the writer must
do so with full awareness of how, when and why. Since narrators are like spirit-guides to the story, when
the point of view is unstable and inconsistent, readers feel rudderless and
lost in the story's emotional landscape. |
|||||||
|
The following chart presents the basic principles of the most common types of narrative point of view, as well as some comments on the advantages and disadvantages of each. |
|||||||
|
|
FIRST PERSON |
THIRD PERSON |
|||||
|
OMNISCIENT |
The storyteller is, both, a central ego in the story and
has godlike abilities to move in and out of time, place, and character
consciousness. Advantages: useful when trying to capture the
perspective of fantastical characters, such as gods and ghosts. Disadvantages: the reader tires of its egotism and
eventually distrusts the "objective" observations of the narrator. |
The storyteller is a disconnected, disembodied
voice--a floating consciousness that approximates the reader's own
consciousness Advantages: allows tremendous flexibility for the
writer to move through complex plots and to present comparative viewpoints;
easiest to use when non-human characters are involved. Disadvantages: demands scrupulous management of verb
tenses; can be hard to maintain consistently without eventually becoming
somewhat impersonal to the reader; its greatest drawback is that, with so
much free rein over the story and its characters, it can make for a story in
want of more focus. |
|||||
|
OBJECTIVE |
The storyteller is like a reporter who is in the story, but not of the story: an
invisible eyeball, self-aware but removed from the events being described. Advantages: creates a context of truth and
accuracy, and puts the reader in the position of a story investigator rather
than a story character. Disadvantages: can preclude the narrator from some
of the more imaginative aspects of storytelling, and can be ultimately too
impersonal, especially when the narrator is forced to be as objective about
herself as she is about other characters. |
The objective storytelling voice is best
suited to third-person, since the removal of ego assures the removal of bias
from the storytelling. The
storyteller relays the facts as they are and does not attempt to act upon
them or extrapolate on their significance. Advantages: assures a trustworthy narrator, which
is especially useful when trying to create intrigue or mystery; allows the
writer to focus on minute details of special interest that will speak for
themselves. Disadvantages: prevents the narrator (not the reader) from
creating a more subjective interpretation of the facts, which can result in a
rather dispassionate and disconnected feeling in the story. |
|||||
|
SUBJECTIVE |
This is the most practical and, for most
writers as well as readers, the most enjoyable way to convey a first-person
point of view. The subjective
experiences of the "I" are part of the storytelling, as the reader
meanwhile discovers how much to trust the subjective viewpoint. Advantages: permits the storyteller to be an
active part of the story, even as its protagonist; gives the reader a strong,
complex, well-developed perspective with which to identify; oftentimes, it
lets the writer be the narrator vicariously. Disadvantages: can create a "cage" from which the reader cannot
escape in order to explore other angles and viewpoints; places responsibility
on the writer to keep the internal landscape of the storyteller as
interesting and compelling as the external landscape of the story, itself. |
As with the first-person, subjectivity (or,
limited omniscience) in the third-person narrator allows the reader to become one of the characters
and compare that character's perspective with his or her own. The main difference, however, is that
the third-person narrator is a "bridge" between the reader and the
character. Advantages: the writer can manipulate and bias
the reader in ways useful and interesting to the storytelling without concern
for how the narrator, itself, will be judged or perceived. Disadvantages: the storyteller is duty-bound to
remain true to the chronology of events and to maintain just the one character viewpoint
during times when more flexible omniscience would permit the story to be told
more completely or more quickly. |
|||||
|
EPISODICALLY LIMITED |
Except for fantasy, sci-fi and horror genres,
in which the "I" can conceivably occupy the bodies of other
characters, this method is not used with the first-person p. o. v. |
The narrative technique is tailor made for
third-person narration, in which the disembodied narrator slips in and out of
the viewpoints of different characters.
Preferable for longer stories and novels, where the writer can take
her time to develop multiple viewpoints. Advantages: allows the writer a loophole around
the restrictions of omniscient and objective storytelling; can create
interesting behind-the-scenes parallels and contrasts between characters; can
construct a version of the truth by way of building a consensus among
different subjective viewpoints. Disadvantages: can be difficult for the writer to
maintain in a balanced and useful way; can create confusion for readers and
prevent them from identifying with one character as the main character or
protagonist; demands scrupulous attention to transitions; should be used in
conjunction with episodic shifts (in plot, setting, or chronological
sequencing). |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
© 2005 Karl J. Sherlock